Smart research. Smart business.  
      
      CEH Report :
 
Table of Contents
 
Summary
Introduction
Manufacturing Processes
Supply and Demand by Region
United states
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Municipal Wastewater Treatment
Municipal Potable Water Treatment
Industrial Water Treatment
Other
Price
Trade
Canada
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Price
Trade
Mexico
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Price
Trade
Central and South America
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Price
Trade
Western Europe
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Price
Trade
Central and Eastern Europe
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Price
Trade
Middle East
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Price
Trade
Japan
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Water Treatment
Etching for PCB
Price
Trade
Asia
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Trade
Imports
Exports
Oceania
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Price
Trade
   
  Ferric Chloride
   
  James Glauser and Hiroaki Mori
  Published February 2008
  CEH Home   |     View Report   |     Purchase      
   
 
  Abstract
   
 

The primary use of ferric chloride is to remove impurities in water and wastewater treatment. The second-largest application is in the production of printed circuit boards (PCBs).

Ferric chloride’s popularity stems from its physical as well as its economic properties. Ferric chloride’s rapid hydrolysis in water makes it an ideal flocculating and precipitating agent. The ferric hydroxide (Fe[OH]3) produced forms flocs (small clumps or tufts) that adsorb suspended particles of various materials (e.g., colloids, clays and bacteria). The clumps, with the adsorbed matter, are then allowed to settle out for removal. Ferric chloride forms precipitates with hydrogen sulfide (H2S), phosphate (PO4), arsenic as arsenate (AsO4) and hydroxide alkalinity (OH). Ferric chloride is highly cost-effective. Though it is not the cheapest water purification material (ferrous salts are usually less expensive, and alum [aluminum sulfate] is comparatively priced), on a per-pound basis ferric chloride delivers better cost performance. Typically, one can expect to use about 30% less ferric chloride than aluminum sulfate (on a dry weight basis) to achieve similar results. This favorable cost/performance has allowed ferric chloride to gain market share. Ferric chloride is one of the few water treatment chemicals that can sequester odors. Unlike hydrogen peroxide and potassium permanganate, the ferric chloride (and sulfate) reaction is irreversible.

The following pie chart shows world consumption of ferric chloride:

Ferric chloride competes with ferric sulfate, aluminum salts such as aluminum sulfate (alum), sodium aluminate, polyaluminum chlorides, and organic polymers in the treatment of raw water and wastewater. The decision to use ferric chloride is highly dependent on location to the source, as transportation costs can be a large part of the delivered cost.

 
Company Information
 

Copyright © 2009 SRI Consulting. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Contact Us